
Another Example Of the Bird Flu Hoax Jon Rappoport VIA Prison Planet\|\| January 09, 2006 Today, press reports from various agencies around the world are headlined, DEATH FROM BIRD FLU. The articles concern two children in the same family, in Turkey, who have just died. For example, here is a brief piece from AFX: Turkey reports second death from bird flu UPDATE 01.05.2006, 02:26 AM ANKARA (AFX) - A second person has died from bird flu at a hospital in eastern Turkey, a doctor there said. The victim was a sister of a 14-year-old boy who died of bird flu Sunday in the same hospital in the town of Van, the doctor, Ahmet Faik Oner, was quoted as saying by the Anatolia news agency. end AFX report Two human deaths. Same family. Bird flu. The doctor said. Reuters has filed several pieces on the two children dying in Turkey. One headline suggests that bird flu, the H5N1 virus, is to blame. However, reading down in two relevant Reuters stories I found, there are comments from a World Health Organization (WHO) official. The tests for bird flu in the children have not been confirmed by WHO. In other words, no one really knows whether the initial diagnosis of human bird flu was accurate. Furthermore, the WHO official states, no one knows what type of diagnostic test was done in Turkey. On the basis of this ignorance, the press has nevertheless taken off with the story and the impression given is: H5N1, bird flu, has killed two children. Now, even if that were the only error, we would have a ridiculous state of affairs, called JUMPING THE GUN. But there is more. The samples of blood from the children are being sent to a WHO lab in the UK, where the final determination will be made. That may sound kosher, but it isn't. Based on past performance (SARS is a perfect example), WHO will make its finding, announce it, and then no other labs outside the WHO sphere will actually have a look at the blood samples or the WHO analysis. Needless to say, this is not how science is done. Here is another layer: as I've found through a search of past articles from Asia during the "bird flu crisis," it is routine to test both humans and animals for H5N1 by conducting an examination of antibodies. What does this mean? The presence of antibodies (scouts for the immune system) is a traditional sign that the person or animal is HEALTHY and has resisted the germ in question. However, since the early 1980s, this science has been turned on its head. Suddenly, antibodies were being taken as evidence of illness or coming illness. Since then, we have had literally millions of false diagnoses of diseases, based on a misinterpretation of the meaning of antibodies. Will WHO test the blood of these two young Turkish children for antibodies? It's possible we'll never know. But in the best-case scenario, let us suppose that WHO searches for the actual H5N1 virus (rather than the antibodies). How will that be done? There is a good chance some form of "amplification" will be used. The PCR test is the primary method. Extremely tiny amounts of genetic material found in the blood of these two children will be "blown up" so that they can be recognized. Let's imagine that this is what WHO will do. And let's further suppose that, after the amplification, WHO scientists will say, "Yes, this genetic material we found is actually from H5N1." Bird flu. Yes, but that's not the end of it. Why, in the first place, did they need that PCR test? Because they found SO LITTLE material of any kind that could be thought to be part of a virus. In a sense, they admitted they couldn't find gigantic amounts of H5N1, so they had to go to this extraordinary length to find anything they could call H5N1. That raises a major problem. Every reasonable disease researcher in the world (and here I'm talking about conventional researchers) knows that, in order to say a particular germ is implicated in illness, you have to find HUGE NUMBERS OF THOSE SPECIFIC GERMS IN THE BODY. Article Posted at www.KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com That's the way it works. Therefore, a positive PCR test proves nothing. It, in fact, suggests that the germ in question had nothing to do with why the person was sick or died. None of these critical factors are being discussed in the mainstream press, and very few alternative outlets are grasping them, either. On top of all of this, no one is providing or alluding to medical histories of the two Turkish children. Had they been ill previously? Were they badly malnourished? Had they been receiving (toxic) drugs dispensed by doctors? Were they living in a situation where sanitation was endemically bad? Had they been exposed to non-pharmaceutical toxic chemicals in their environment? Pesticides used on nearby chicken farms? Industrial waste? After arriving at the hospital shortly before their deaths, were they treated with toxic medicines? Was the hospital prone to the spread of infection in-house? The issues I'm raising in this article are not at all esoteric. They are quite basic. But the press does not have the time or the inclination to examine them. Too busy spreading fear about an oncoming "pandemic" that, at the most, has killed 70 people globally over the last two-plus years. And when I say "at the most," I mean it. Because no one has released, in one place, the EXACT tests run (and the ensuing analysis) on those 70 people. So we have no idea how or why they died. It's interesting to note that, at last count, the 2006 US Defense Appropriations Bill sets aside 3.8 billion dollars for "flu preparedness." They are talking about bird flu. 3.8 billion dollars. In my many articles on the subject of imagination, I frequently ask the question, do you want someone else to imagine the world for you, or do you want to use your own creative power to invent your world? As you can see, bird flu is an excellent example of other people imagining the world for you. Here is the hook they use. They get you, through constant pounding on the same theme in the press, to ask yourself the question, "But what if they're right? What if we are on the brink of worldwide decimation from H5N1?" Once you seriously entertain and mull over and digest and ponder that question, they've got you. They own you. You may as well be asking yourself, "What if someone on the edge of the Milky Way blows his nose, and a germ we've never encountered drifts all the way to Hong Kong or Capetown?" What if the sun yawns, feels bored, and shuts down tomorrow? About KDR \| \| Home \| \| Weekly Features Archive	Weekly Weekly Features Archive
In Depth The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave Knowledge Driven Look at Your Favorite Canadian Political Parties
Archive November December January 2005 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 04 Weekly Features

Another Example Of the Bird Flu Hoax

Jon Rappoport VIA Prison Planet|| January 09, 2006

Today, press reports from various agencies around the world are headlined, DEATH FROM BIRD FLU.

The articles concern two children in the same family, in Turkey, who have just died.

For example, here is a brief piece from AFX:

Turkey reports second death from bird flu

UPDATE

01.05.2006, 02:26 AM

ANKARA (AFX) - A second person has died from bird flu at a hospital in eastern Turkey, a doctor there said.

The victim was a sister of a 14-year-old boy who died of bird flu Sunday in the same hospital in the town of Van, the doctor, Ahmet Faik Oner, was quoted as saying by the Anatolia news agency.

end AFX report

Two human deaths. Same family. Bird flu. The doctor said.

Reuters has filed several pieces on the two children dying in Turkey. One headline suggests that bird flu, the H5N1 virus, is to blame.

However, reading down in two relevant Reuters stories I found, there are comments from a World Health Organization (WHO) official. The tests for bird flu in the children have not been confirmed by WHO. In other words, no one really knows whether the initial diagnosis of human bird flu was accurate.

Furthermore, the WHO official states, no one knows what type of diagnostic test was done in Turkey.

On the basis of this ignorance, the press has nevertheless taken off with the story and the impression given is: H5N1, bird flu, has killed two children.

Now, even if that were the only error, we would have a ridiculous state of affairs, called JUMPING THE GUN.

But there is more.

The samples of blood from the children are being sent to a WHO lab in the UK, where the final determination will be made. That may sound kosher, but it isn't. Based on past performance (SARS is a perfect example), WHO will make its finding, announce it, and then no other labs outside the WHO sphere will actually have a look at the blood samples or the WHO analysis.

Needless to say, this is not how science is done.

Here is another layer: as I've found through a search of past articles from Asia during the "bird flu crisis," it is routine to test both humans and animals for H5N1 by conducting an examination of antibodies.

What does this mean? The presence of antibodies (scouts for the immune system) is a traditional sign that the person or animal is HEALTHY and has resisted the germ in question. However, since the early 1980s, this science has been turned on its head. Suddenly, antibodies were being taken as evidence of illness or coming illness.

Since then, we have had literally millions of false diagnoses of diseases, based on a misinterpretation of the meaning of antibodies.

Will WHO test the blood of these two young Turkish children for antibodies? It's possible we'll never know.

But in the best-case scenario, let us suppose that WHO searches for the actual H5N1 virus (rather than the antibodies). How will that be done?

There is a good chance some form of "amplification" will be used. The PCR test is the primary method. Extremely tiny amounts of genetic material found in the blood of these two children will be "blown up" so that they can be recognized. Let's imagine that this is what WHO will do. And let's further suppose that, after the amplification, WHO scientists will say, "Yes, this genetic material we found is actually from H5N1."

Bird flu.

Yes, but that's not the end of it. Why, in the first place, did they need that PCR test? Because they found SO LITTLE material of any kind that could be thought to be part of a virus.

In a sense, they admitted they couldn't find gigantic amounts of H5N1, so they had to go to this extraordinary length to find anything they could call H5N1.

That raises a major problem. Every reasonable disease researcher in the world (and here I'm talking about conventional researchers) knows that, in order to say a particular germ is implicated in illness, you have to find HUGE NUMBERS OF THOSE SPECIFIC GERMS IN THE BODY.

Article Posted at www.KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com

That's the way it works.

Therefore, a positive PCR test proves nothing. It, in fact, suggests that the germ in question had nothing to do with why the person was sick or died.

None of these critical factors are being discussed in the mainstream press, and very few alternative outlets are grasping them, either.

On top of all of this, no one is providing or alluding to medical histories of the two Turkish children. Had they been ill previously? Were they badly malnourished? Had they been receiving (toxic) drugs dispensed by doctors? Were they living in a situation where sanitation was endemically bad? Had they been exposed to non-pharmaceutical toxic chemicals in their environment? Pesticides used on nearby chicken farms? Industrial waste?

After arriving at the hospital shortly before their deaths, were they treated with toxic medicines? Was the hospital prone to the spread of infection in-house?

The issues I'm raising in this article are not at all esoteric. They are quite basic.

But the press does not have the time or the inclination to examine them. Too busy spreading fear about an oncoming "pandemic" that, at the most, has killed 70 people globally over the last two-plus years.

And when I say "at the most," I mean it. Because no one has released, in one place, the EXACT tests run (and the ensuing analysis) on those 70 people. So we have no idea how or why they died.

It's interesting to note that, at last count, the 2006 US Defense Appropriations Bill sets aside 3.8 billion dollars for "flu preparedness." They are talking about bird flu.

3.8 billion dollars.

In my many articles on the subject of imagination, I frequently ask the question, do you want someone else to imagine the world for you, or do you want to use your own creative power to invent your world?

As you can see, bird flu is an excellent example of other people imagining the world for you.

Here is the hook they use. They get you, through constant pounding on the same theme in the press, to ask yourself the question, "But what if they're right? What if we are on the brink of worldwide decimation from H5N1?"

Once you seriously entertain and mull over and digest and ponder that question, they've got you. They own you.

You may as well be asking yourself, "What if someone on the edge of the Milky Way blows his nose, and a germ we've never encountered drifts all the way to Hong Kong or Capetown?"

What if the sun yawns, feels bored, and shuts down tomorrow?

About KDR | | Home | | Weekly Features Archive

Weekly

Chicken Little Terrorist: Creating Fake Terrorists

Weekly Features Archive

In Depth

The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave

Knowledge Driven Look at Your Favorite Canadian Political Parties