Deploying tanks to Afghanistan a political risk at home and abroad: experts

Members of the famed Royal 22nd Regiment are scheduled to ship out to Afghanistan next year as part of a planned rotation. Moving up the deployment of other Quebec units could create a political problem for Harper, if there are casualties among them.

That would bring the war more sharply into focus for Quebecers at time when Conservatives are trying to win their support, said Pierre Martin, a political science professor at the University of Montreal. “It will hit home much more strongly.

“When the bodies go back to Joliette, Lac-St-Jean or wherever these people come from, in Quebec you’ll see the regional media covering it more deeply. In Quebec, where you don’t see that much support (for the war), this might translate into less-muted opposition.

“There will be people increasingly concerned about the human cost of the intervention. Over time it won’t get any easier.”

Experts in guerrilla wars say, from a conventional military point of view, the decision to send tanks makes sense, especially if the Taliban mass for conventional-style battles as they did recently in the Panjwaii district, southwest of Kandahar.

But there is a danger that the appearance of heavy armour in the chalky, mud-walled villages and towns will backfire in the battle for Afghan hearts and minds.

“If you see tanks in your streets it’s hard not to think about it as an army of occupation,” said Gavin Cameron, a specialist in counter-insurgency wars at the University of Calgary’s Centre for Military and Strategic Studies.

By buttoning down inside a tank, Canadian soldiers could also end up losing personal contact with locals, which is crucial in building public support.

The firepower of the Leopards also has the potential to create a backlash among Afghans who’ve already complained about civilian casualties and destruction of property.

“As with any modern armaments, there’s a considerable destructive potential and the forces using them have to be careful and conscious of the scope” of their use, Cameron said in an interview.

The 42.5-tonne Leopard carries a 105-mm cannon, as well as machineguns.

Since cabinet hasn’t approved any proposal, the army was reluctant to talk about potential ramifications.

“As part of prudent contingency planning, the army is conducting staff checks to determine what additional personnel and equipment could made available for augmentation of ongoing operations or commitment to new operations,” said Maj. Daryl Morrell

“We’re not in a place where we can discuss further details of our planning at this time.”

Calls to Defence Minister Gordon O’Connor’s office were not returned.

The deployment of tanks would have to go hand in hand with renewed efforts to rebuild infrastructure and deliver humanitarian aid, said Andrew Krepinevich Jr., a former U.S. Army officer.

“Quite frankly I think the (Afghan people) are more likely to judge us on whether we’re improving their quality of life or not,” said Krepinevich, who written and lectured extensively on guerrilla war.

“When the Taliban mass for attacks you do need something, but what I would want to know from the Canadian government is what kind of role to they see the tanks playing in southern Afghanistan and how well suited are they to that role.”

Read the full article here

Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here.