Read Today's Knowledge Driven News

About KDR

HOME

Articles by KDR

Canadians Should Pay NOT to be Poisoned: NDP

V for Vendetta - R for Reality

Canadian Bird Flu Pandemic Looming ?

Shill of the Week: Stephan Harper

Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer

Chicken Little Terrorist of the Week: Creating Fake Terrorists

Shill of the Week: Paul Martin

The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave


Bonus

HIV=AIDS - Fact of Fraud
The Real Face Of The European Union
Loose Change 2
The Masters of the Universe
Bill Hicks on the Elite
Sweet Misery

Alleged use of terror by the French security services

Aangirfan
October 04, 2006

Police State "Bomb attacks in France killing 13 people in 1995 were attributed to the anti-government Algerian Armed Islamic Group (GIA). Many think that Algerian army provocateurs were responsible... Many atrocities... were the work of army undercover units."

The excellent WSWS tells us about the alleged use of terror by the French security services. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jan2006/fran-j26.shtml

The WSWS article, of 26 January 2006, is entitled 'France: Judge Bruguière—utilising anti-terrorism as a political instrument' and is written by Antoine Lerougetel.

Lerougetel quotes from Le Monde, December 23:

“At present, 99 persons suspected of Islamic activities are being detained in French prisons.”

Lerougetel suggests the anti-terrorism measures are being used as a means of social and political control and as an instrument of foreign policy.

Lerougetel tells us about Judge Bruguière.

Bruguiere has been at the head of the French anti-terror apparatus since 1986.

France's Minister of the Interior is Nicolas Sarkozy who is Jewish. Sarkozy's anti-terrorist bill, passed on 22 December 2005, gives extra powers to Bruguiere.

The report on the activities of the 14th Section and Judge Bruguière drawn up in 1999 by international jurists for the International Federation of Human Rights (IFHR) and the French League of Human Rights (LHR) reports:
* Judges tend to resort to speculation regarding the suspects’ “moral” approval of the general objectives of a presumed criminal or terrorist activity.
* Incidental contacts with prime suspects are considered proof of “participation” (guilt by association).
* A suspect’s failure to “cooperate” with the investigators, e.g., by incriminating co-defendants, is regarded as evidence of his or her support for the targeted organisation.
* Long, arbitrary pre-trial detention is used as a means of obtaining confessions of questionable value.

According to Lerougetel in WSWS:

Read the full article here

Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here.

Maple Leaf Footer
About KDR | | Home | | Weekly Features Archive

Weekly

Quote: US State Department Shill: Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn Chicken Little Terrorist: Homegrown Terror Dumbass: Stephen Harper's Wife
Weekly Features Archive

In Depth

What Is Wrong With Canada
What Is Wrong With Canada ?


Recent 9-11 News Suppressed by the Media
Recent 9-11 News Suppressed by the Media


Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer
Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer


Number 1 Reason YOU Are a Slave
The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave


Liberal Party Logo Conservative Party Logo New Democrat Party Logo
Knowledge Driven Look at Your Favourite Canadian Political Parties

Archive

August
September

October 2006

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Weekly Features
2006
2005


Read Today's Knowledge Driven News

About KDR

KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com

Counter

Copyright © 2005-6 KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com