Votes for small federal parties now worth $1.75: Knowledge Driven Revolution

Canada's small political parties will share around $500,000 after an Ontario Superior Court judge struck down a law that allowed federal parties to be paid $1.75 per vote they received only if they took more than two per cent of the vote.

The law ensured big political parties took home lots of public money after each election, but made votes for small parties worthless in a sense.

A challenge to the law was brought forward by a group of small parties, including the Canadian Action Party, the Christian Heritage Party, the Communist Party of Canada, the Green Party, the Marijuana Party and the Progressive Canadian Party.

Among them, only the Green Party took enough of the vote in the 2004 election — 4.3 per cent — to earn money for each ballot cast in its favour.

Funding needed to communicate to voters

In his reasons for the ruling, Judge P. Theodore Matlow wrote that the law violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

He noted that parties needed funding to make voters aware of their platforms and candidates, and said a voter needs that information in order to vote in a way that genuinely reflects his or her preferences.

He said the law made it difficult for members of small parties to "play a meaningful role in the electoral process."

Matlow said he recognized that the money per vote was not much, but "such funding would substantially increase the possibilities that such parties could make voters aware of their platform and candidates."

Tracy Parsons, leader of the Progressive Canadian party, said the ruling restores fairness to the electoral process.

"If you're going to fund any, you should fund all," said Parsons, who said she didn't really believe taxes should fund political parties at all.

However, she said the money will help her party to communicate to voters.

"At least now they'll know we exist."

Read the full article here

Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here.

Read Today's Knowledge Driven News
HOME Canadians Should Pay NOT to be Poisoned: NDP V for Vendetta - R for Reality Canadian Bird Flu Pandemic Looming ? Shill of the Week: Stephan Harper Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer Chicken Little Terrorist of the Week: Creating Fake Terrorists Shill of the Week: Paul Martin The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave	Votes for small federal parties now worth $1.75 CBC News October 14, 2006 Canada's small political parties will share around $500,000 after an Ontario Superior Court judge struck down a law that allowed federal parties to be paid $1.75 per vote they received only if they took more than two per cent of the vote. The law ensured big political parties took home lots of public money after each election, but made votes for small parties worthless in a sense. A challenge to the law was brought forward by a group of small parties, including the Canadian Action Party, the Christian Heritage Party, the Communist Party of Canada, the Green Party, the Marijuana Party and the Progressive Canadian Party. Among them, only the Green Party took enough of the vote in the 2004 election — 4.3 per cent — to earn money for each ballot cast in its favour. Funding needed to communicate to voters In his reasons for the ruling, Judge P. Theodore Matlow wrote that the law violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He noted that parties needed funding to make voters aware of their platforms and candidates, and said a voter needs that information in order to vote in a way that genuinely reflects his or her preferences. He said the law made it difficult for members of small parties to "play a meaningful role in the electoral process." Matlow said he recognized that the money per vote was not much, but "such funding would substantially increase the possibilities that such parties could make voters aware of their platform and candidates." Tracy Parsons, leader of the Progressive Canadian party, said the ruling restores fairness to the electoral process. "If you're going to fund any, you should fund all," said Parsons, who said she didn't really believe taxes should fund political parties at all. However, she said the money will help her party to communicate to voters. "At least now they'll know we exist." Read the full article here Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here. About KDR \| \| Home \| \| Weekly Features Archive	Weekly Features Archive
		What Is Wrong With Canada ? Recent 9-11 News Suppressed by the Media Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave Knowledge Driven Look at Your Favourite Canadian Political Parties
		August September October 2006 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Weekly Features 2006 2005 Read Today's Knowledge Driven News
		Counter
Copyright © 2005-6 KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com