Britain 'risking defeat in Afghanistan': Knowledge Driven Revolution

Related - Troops will be in Afghanistan for next 20 years, says commander

Field Marshal Sir Peter Inge, the former head of Britain's armed forces, has broken ranks to launch an attack on the current military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, warning that British forces risk defeat in Afghanistan.

In one of the strongest interventions in the conduct of the War on Terror, Inge also charged a lack of any 'clear strategy' guiding British operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

His comments came as President George Bush met his military and political officials to consider fresh tactics over Iraq, amid a mood of crisis in Washington over the violence.

The remarks by the former chief of the defence staff, who also served on the Butler Commission into intelligence failures in Iraq, follow those by the present head of the British Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, who warned that the presence of British troops in Iraq had 'exacerbated' security problems in the country.

Inge's intervention, coming amid growing speculation about Britain's exit strategy from Iraq, is the first criticism of operations by a former head of the British army. His comments, made at a meeting of European experts on Tuesday and published here for the first time, reflect the growing dismay among senior military officers and civil servants involved in defence and foreign affairs, that in the critical areas of Afghanistan and Iraq Britain lacked clear foreign and defence policies separate from the US.

'I don't believe we have a clear strategy in either Afghanistan or Iraq. I sense we've lost the ability to think strategically. Deep down inside me, I worry that the British army could risk operational failure if we're not careful in Afghanistan. We need to recognise the test that I think they could face there,' he told the debate held by Open Europe, an independent think tank campaigning for EU reform.

Inge added that Whitehall had surrendered its ability to think strategically and that despite the immense pressures on the army, defence received neither the research nor funding it required.

'I sense that Whitehall has lost the knack of putting together inter-departmental thinking about strategy. It talks about how we're going to do in Afghanistan, it doesn't really talk about strategy.'

The Iraq issue has been brought to a head by the sense of crisis enveloping Iraq, where attacks during Ramadan have increased by 22 per cent, US deaths are touching record levels, and British troops in the south of the country have been confronted by the spectre of Shia gunmen launching large-scale attacks.

Inge's comments come amid growing pressure in Washington from Republican Party loyalists, fearful of a meltdown in Mid Term elections to Congress on 7 November, for a change in direction for US policy on Iraq.

Although Bush has admitted that tactics on the ground could change in response to the latest violence, he insisted in his weekly radio address yesterday that there would be no change in the overall strategy.

Last night there were reports of a 'calm but tense' truce over the Iraqi city of Al Amarah, which was taken over by Shia militia on Friday just two months after the province was handed back to Iraq security forces. A British battle group of 600 troops remained on standby to sweep into the open city and regain control if required, an event that Ministry of Defence officials admitted might prompt a rethink of Britain's exit policy.

A Ministry of Defence source said yesterday that nothing had changed on strategic planning, dismissing reports that Washington and London were working frantically to agree an exit strategy.

'We are not planning on changing our strategy,' said the source adding that there had been no dialogue on the issue between defence secretary, Des Browne, and his US counterpart, Donald Rumsfeld.

Read Today's Knowledge Driven News
HOME Canadians Should Pay NOT to be Poisoned: NDP V for Vendetta - R for Reality Canadian Bird Flu Pandemic Looming ? Shill of the Week: Stephan Harper Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer Chicken Little Terrorist of the Week: Creating Fake Terrorists Shill of the Week: Paul Martin The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave	Britain 'risking defeat in Afghanistan' Mark Townsend and Peter Beaumont - The Observer October 23, 2006 Related - Troops will be in Afghanistan for next 20 years, says commander Field Marshal Sir Peter Inge, the former head of Britain's armed forces, has broken ranks to launch an attack on the current military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, warning that British forces risk defeat in Afghanistan. In one of the strongest interventions in the conduct of the War on Terror, Inge also charged a lack of any 'clear strategy' guiding British operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. His comments came as President George Bush met his military and political officials to consider fresh tactics over Iraq, amid a mood of crisis in Washington over the violence. The remarks by the former chief of the defence staff, who also served on the Butler Commission into intelligence failures in Iraq, follow those by the present head of the British Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, who warned that the presence of British troops in Iraq had 'exacerbated' security problems in the country. Inge's intervention, coming amid growing speculation about Britain's exit strategy from Iraq, is the first criticism of operations by a former head of the British army. His comments, made at a meeting of European experts on Tuesday and published here for the first time, reflect the growing dismay among senior military officers and civil servants involved in defence and foreign affairs, that in the critical areas of Afghanistan and Iraq Britain lacked clear foreign and defence policies separate from the US. 'I don't believe we have a clear strategy in either Afghanistan or Iraq. I sense we've lost the ability to think strategically. Deep down inside me, I worry that the British army could risk operational failure if we're not careful in Afghanistan. We need to recognise the test that I think they could face there,' he told the debate held by Open Europe, an independent think tank campaigning for EU reform. Inge added that Whitehall had surrendered its ability to think strategically and that despite the immense pressures on the army, defence received neither the research nor funding it required. 'I sense that Whitehall has lost the knack of putting together inter-departmental thinking about strategy. It talks about how we're going to do in Afghanistan, it doesn't really talk about strategy.' The Iraq issue has been brought to a head by the sense of crisis enveloping Iraq, where attacks during Ramadan have increased by 22 per cent, US deaths are touching record levels, and British troops in the south of the country have been confronted by the spectre of Shia gunmen launching large-scale attacks. Inge's comments come amid growing pressure in Washington from Republican Party loyalists, fearful of a meltdown in Mid Term elections to Congress on 7 November, for a change in direction for US policy on Iraq. Although Bush has admitted that tactics on the ground could change in response to the latest violence, he insisted in his weekly radio address yesterday that there would be no change in the overall strategy. Last night there were reports of a 'calm but tense' truce over the Iraqi city of Al Amarah, which was taken over by Shia militia on Friday just two months after the province was handed back to Iraq security forces. A British battle group of 600 troops remained on standby to sweep into the open city and regain control if required, an event that Ministry of Defence officials admitted might prompt a rethink of Britain's exit policy. A Ministry of Defence source said yesterday that nothing had changed on strategic planning, dismissing reports that Washington and London were working frantically to agree an exit strategy. 'We are not planning on changing our strategy,' said the source adding that there had been no dialogue on the issue between defence secretary, Des Browne, and his US counterpart, Donald Rumsfeld. Read the full article here Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here. About KDR \| \| Home \| \| Weekly Features Archive	Weekly Features Archive
		What Is Wrong With Canada ? Recent 9-11 News Suppressed by the Media Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave Knowledge Driven Look at Your Favourite Canadian Political Parties
		August September October 2006 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Weekly Features 2006 2005 Read Today's Knowledge Driven News
		Counter
Copyright � 2005-6 KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com