Ont. can't be sued by West Nile victims, court rules: Knowledge Driven Revolution

Ontario residents who got ill from the West Nile virus in 2002 cannot sue provincial health officials for negligence, the Ontario Court of Appeal said Friday.

The province's highest court threw out a lawsuit, saying the government could not have been expected to prevent an individual from contracting the disease.

"It is plain and obvious on the facts that have been pleaded that Ontario does not owe a private law duty of care to individuals to prevent the spread of (West Nile virus)," the Appeal Court said.

"The statement of claim should be struck."

In 2003, Ontario began large public health campaigns warning about the threat of West Nile from mosquitoes. Lawyer Doug Elliott said that was too late, and neighbouring New York State had been more vigilant.

Elliott sued the Ontario government on behalf of 40 victims and families who allegedly got sick after being bitten by mosquitoes in the summer of 2002.

The suit alleged the province should have prevented the West Nile outbreak that season and that the province failed to warn people about the higher risk.

"People need to remember that back in 2002, the government was not telling us how serious a threat West Nile virus was and what we needed to do to protect ourselves," said Pat Anweiler, a Toronto nurse who uses a wheelchair after an infection.

"Had I known back then that I was in danger, I could have protected myself."

Two lower courts allowed him to proceed with the lawsuits. In a unanimous decision on Friday, three judges said public officials should be left to decide where to focus their attention without the threat of lawsuits.

Victims can't sue for carelessness: lawyer

"The Court of Appeal of Ontario has essentially said that if there's a future Walkerton, then the victims of carelessness of public health officials are going to have to live with the consequences of that negligence," Elliott said, referring to the seven people who died after a tainted water outbreak in southwestern Ontario.

"They will not be allowed to sue public health officials for carelessness," he told CBC News.

The decision is also a setback for people who are suing the Ontario government after they were infected with SARS in 2003 during the second wave of cases, which happened after public health officials relaxed their vigilance.

In the West Nile case, the province argued to strike the statement of claim on the grounds it was baseless, saying it owned no "duty of care" to individuals to prevent the spread of infectious diseases.

The provinces also argued that the failure to implement prevention measures rested with local boards of health.

The plaintiffs said they are considering whether to ask the Supreme Court of Canada to review the decision. They have 60 days to do so.

Read the full article here

Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here.

Read Today's Knowledge Driven News
HOME Canadians Should Pay NOT to be Poisoned: NDP V for Vendetta - R for Reality Canadian Bird Flu Pandemic Looming ? Shill of the Week: Stephan Harper Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer Chicken Little Terrorist of the Week: Creating Fake Terrorists Shill of the Week: Paul Martin The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave	Ont. can't be sued by West Nile victims, court rules CBC News November 06, 2006 Ontario residents who got ill from the West Nile virus in 2002 cannot sue provincial health officials for negligence, the Ontario Court of Appeal said Friday. The province's highest court threw out a lawsuit, saying the government could not have been expected to prevent an individual from contracting the disease. "It is plain and obvious on the facts that have been pleaded that Ontario does not owe a private law duty of care to individuals to prevent the spread of (West Nile virus)," the Appeal Court said. "The statement of claim should be struck." In 2003, Ontario began large public health campaigns warning about the threat of West Nile from mosquitoes. Lawyer Doug Elliott said that was too late, and neighbouring New York State had been more vigilant. Elliott sued the Ontario government on behalf of 40 victims and families who allegedly got sick after being bitten by mosquitoes in the summer of 2002. The suit alleged the province should have prevented the West Nile outbreak that season and that the province failed to warn people about the higher risk. "People need to remember that back in 2002, the government was not telling us how serious a threat West Nile virus was and what we needed to do to protect ourselves," said Pat Anweiler, a Toronto nurse who uses a wheelchair after an infection. "Had I known back then that I was in danger, I could have protected myself." Two lower courts allowed him to proceed with the lawsuits. In a unanimous decision on Friday, three judges said public officials should be left to decide where to focus their attention without the threat of lawsuits. Victims can't sue for carelessness: lawyer "The Court of Appeal of Ontario has essentially said that if there's a future Walkerton, then the victims of carelessness of public health officials are going to have to live with the consequences of that negligence," Elliott said, referring to the seven people who died after a tainted water outbreak in southwestern Ontario. "They will not be allowed to sue public health officials for carelessness," he told CBC News. The decision is also a setback for people who are suing the Ontario government after they were infected with SARS in 2003 during the second wave of cases, which happened after public health officials relaxed their vigilance. In the West Nile case, the province argued to strike the statement of claim on the grounds it was baseless, saying it owned no "duty of care" to individuals to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. The provinces also argued that the failure to implement prevention measures rested with local boards of health. The plaintiffs said they are considering whether to ask the Supreme Court of Canada to review the decision. They have 60 days to do so. Read the full article here Broken Link? If the link to the original article is broken or has been altered you can view the article by clicking here. About KDR \| \| Home \| \| Weekly Features Archive	Weekly Features Archive
		What Is Wrong With Canada ? Recent 9-11 News Suppressed by the Media Aspartame: The Sweetest Killer The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave Knowledge Driven Look at Your Favourite Canadian Political Parties
		August September October 2006 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 04 Weekly Features 2006 2005 Read Today's Knowledge Driven News
		Counter
Copyright � 2005-6 KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com